English title: A Re-Assessment of Common Theoretical Approaches to Explain Gender Differences in Continuing Training Participation

Author(s): Martina Dieckhoff - Nadia Steiber -

Language: English

Type: Journal article

Year: 2011


It is often argued that gender differences in access to continuing training are a central cause of persisting gender inequalities in occupational attainment. Yet existing empirical work has presented rather mixed evidence regarding a potential sex gap in training participation. In this article, we carry out an empirical test of the central theoretical models commonly used to explain gender differences in continuing training participation. Using the European Social Survey, we find that male employees are more likely to train than their female colleagues, controlling for worker, firm and job characteristics, with some tentative evidence for differences across countries. Common theoretical approaches to understanding gender differences in continuing skill investment to some degree explain men's training incidence, while they largely fail to predict that of women.

Volume: 49

Issue: 0

From page no: 135

To page no: 157

Refereed: Yes

DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-8543.2010.00824.X

Journal: British Journal of Industrial Relations

By continuing to visit our site, you accept the use of cookies. We use cookies for website functionality
and analyzing site usage through anonymized Google Analytics tracking. [Read more]